About Me

Name: Patrick M. Griffin
Email: gmanj77@hotmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Search

Blog Roll

 

Israel’s "Supreme Court," Same -Sex Marriages "Performed Abroad," the Pharisees, Judaism, and Coprophagia

Posted by Patrick M. Griffin on Saturday, July 18, 2009 2:38:31 PM
"We don't have a Jewish state here. We have Sodom and Gomorrah here"  --  Moshe Gafni, ultra-Orthodox Israeli "lawmaker," reacting to the 7/14/2009 Israeli Supreme Court ruling that recognizes same-sex marriages "performed abroad."


The jews are homosexuals, so the "ruling" should not surprise anyone.  What is new is that homosexuality, at least the "gay" form, is no longer something the jews are ashamed of, is no longer what is ssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhh in jewish.

What then does it mean to be jewish?  What is it that the jews are to be ashamed of, now that "gay" is mainstream, as a "right"?

Does "gay" include the gnawing of jews, each one upon the other, as in the Dreyfus Affair? (1) Or, has "gay" done away with "l’Affaire," the practice which left Europe broken from nervous exhaustion and war? (2).

To find the answer, one must look to the practice(s) of the jews that the jews have  kept secret.  There is just one such practice of the jews, a practice that, although Jesus Christ exposed it 2,000 years ago (3), has been carefully kept secret by the jews:  Coprophagia (4).

To those who know that there is no such thing as "gay," except for zombies "programmed to function" that way, it comes as no surprise that the sodomites, known sadomasochists, and in fact the only sadomasochists (5), have as an essential aspect of rabid-in-ical judaism the practice of coprophagia.  

Humanity must now expose the practice of coprophagia, to bring it into the light.  When this is done the Masada of coprophagia, the last redoubt of judaism, will be destroyed.

Patrick M. Griffin


Notes:

(1). The Dreyfus Affair was a sick inversion of the Kingdom of God, which was begun with the first Christian communities of the New Testament with the Ministry of St. Paul:

Ephesians 4:25 (New International Version)

 25Therefore each of you must put off falsehood and speak truthfully to his neighbor, for we are all members of one body.

In the inversion of this community in the Dreyfus Affair, each of the jew's bodies are superimposed on each other, so that the jews f--- themselves as they f--- each other.

(2). Freud, the psychopath jew who formulated the sick inverted satanic "trinity" of "Id, Ego, and Superego" theorized that "Thanatos" was responsible for the self-destruction of Europe in WW I, but it was actually the puppeteerings of the Pharisees, particuarly of Her Majesty's Government, which brought about the war. No doubt the Serbian assassin of Archduke Francis Ferdinand was a zombie controlled by the jews.

(3).  Jesus Christ, a Samaritan, exposed the practice of coprophagia by the jews by healing a man born blind with mud, thereby setting up an opposition between Humanity and the jews.  See John, Chapter 9.

(4).  Coprophagia - eating feces; in human a symptom of some kinds of insanity
Source: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/coprophagia

(5). Note that Sigmund Freud, whose name is a very sick appropriation of the German word for "friend" which is "freund," although posing as a "scientist," admits this in the 1905 book "Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality," in the third essay "The Transformations of Puberty."  Indeed, Freud's "interpretation" evidences Freud's own participation in the Dreyfus Affair: Freud pointed out that sadism and masochism, terms that first gained currency in the work of Richard Krafft-Ebing, "are habitually found together in the same individual" and "occur together regularly as pairs of opposites" (pp. 159-60).  In other words, each jew gnaws on the other as it gnaws on itself.  See foonote (1) above.

Note that Einstein won the Noble Prize in 1905 for the "photo-electric effect," which is a very obvious manifestation of the "quantum" nature of light (light comes in and electrons get ejected from a material).  Einstein would later theorize that "things, in general, are relative," with the "Theory of General Relativity," in an attempt to decenter Western Civilization from Her Christian foundation.

In terms of the genesis of the sadism/masochism practice, Freud eventually focused on masochism, which he discussed first in 1915 in "Instincts and Their Vicissitudes" in terms of the presence of sexual excitation, and then formulated more generally in "The Economic Problem of Masochism" (1924), written after the introduction of the death instinct.  Note that Freud is admitting that the cause of WW I is none other than the jews doing the Dreyfus Affair!  

Note the Pharisees, who are in manichean opposition to judaism via Maimonides, are "1/2" masochists, because they "lay" with each other, taking turns.  However, one is either a masochists or one is not a masochists, as in the "Italian" comedian Andrew Dice Clay's formulation: "You either suck d---, or you do not," which means that the Pharisees, like the rest of those of judaism,  do, no joke.  Note that Clay has been repackaged as "Vin Diesel," an openly "tu tu" Vinnie moron.

From Wikipedia: In logic, the semantic principle of bivalence states that every proposition is either true or false. The dual semantic principle, the principle of contravalence, states that no proposition is both true and false. The principle of bivalence is related to the excluded middle though the latter is a syntactic expression of the language of a logic of the form "P or ¬P". The difference between the principle and the law is important because there are logics which validate the law but which do not validate the principle, and vice versa. For example, the "Logic of Paradox" (LP) of Graham Priest validates the law of excluded middle though its intended semantics is not bivalent.

The intended semantics of classical logic is bivalent, but this is not true of every semantics for classical logic. Classical logic may be characterized by the class of boolean algebras and many-valued matrices in which propositions (sentences) may take one of more than two truth values. The two-valued semantics has a special status, however, besides being the intended one. E.g. every finite boolean algebra is isomorphic to a power of the two-valued boolean algebra.

In logic , the law of the excluded middle states that the propositional calculus  formula "P ? ¬P" ("P or not-P") can be deduced from the calculus under investigation. It is one of the defining properties of classical systems of logic. However, some systems of logic have different but analogous laws, while others reject the law of excluded middle entirely.

The law is also known as the law (or principle) of the excluded third, or, in Latin, principium tertii exclusi. Yet another Latin designation for this law is Tertium non datur: "there is no third (possibility)".

The law of excluded middle is related to the principle of bivalence, which is a semantic principle instead of a law that can be deduced from the calculus.

For some finite n-valued logics, there is an analogous law called the law of excluded n+1th. If negation is cyclic  and '?' is a "max operator", then the law can be expressed in the object language by (P ? ~P ? ~~P ? ... ? ~...~P), where '~...~' represents n-1 negation signs and '? ... ?' n-1 disjunction signs. It is easy to check that the sentence must receive at least one of the n truth values (and not a value that is not one of the n).

For example, if P is the proposition:

Socrates is mortal.

then the law of excluded middle holds that the logical disjunction :

Either Socrates is mortal or Socrates is not mortal.

is true by virtue of its form alone. That is, the "middle" position, that Socrates is neither mortal nor immortal, is excluded by logic, and therefore either the first possibility (Socrates is mortal) or its negation (Socrates is not mortal) must be true.

An example of an argument that depends on the law of excluded middle follows. We seek to prove that there exist two irrational numbers a and b such that

ab is rational.

It is known that is irrational. Consider the number

.

Clearly (excluded middle) this number is either rational or irrational. If it is rational, the proof is complete, and

a= and b=.

But if is irrational, then let

a= and b=.

Then

a^b =

and 2 is certainly rational. This concludes the proof.

In the above argument, the assertion "this number is either rational or irrational" invokes the law of excluded middle. An intuitionist, for example, would not accept this argument without further support for that statement. This might come in the form of a proof that the number in question is in fact irrational (or rational, as the case may be); or a finite algorithm that could determine whether the number is rational or not.

Aristotle  wrote that ambiguity can arise from the use of ambiguous names, but cannot exist in the "facts" themselves:

It is impossible, then, that 'being a man' should mean precisely 'not being a man', if 'man' not only signifies something about one subject but also has one significance. … And it will not be possible to be and not to be the same thing, except in virtue of an ambiguity, just as if one whom we call 'man', and others were to call 'not-man'; but the point in question is not this, whether the same thing can at the same time be and not be a man in name, but whether it can be in fact. (Metaphysics 4.4, W.D. Ross (trans.), GBWW 8, 525–526).

Aristotle's assertion that "...it will not be possible to be and not to be the same thing", which would be written in propositional logic as ¬ (PP), is not the statement a modern logician would call the law of excluded middle (P ? ¬P). The former claims that no statement is both true and false; the latter requires that no statement is neither true nor false. ? ¬

However, Aristotle also writes, "since it is impossible that contradictories should be at the same time true of the same thing, obviously contraries also cannot belong at the same time to the same thing" (Book IV, CH 6, p. 531). He then proposes that "there cannot be an intermediate between contradictories, but of one subject we must either affirm or deny any one predicate" (Book IV, CH 7, p. 531). In the context of Aristotle's traditional logic , this is a remarkably precise statement of the law of excluded middle, P ? ¬P.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Demjanjuk and Justice

Posted by Patrick M. Griffin on Friday, July 17, 2009 11:26:41 AM
Demjanjuk is most likely guilty of being a guard at Sobibor. But why did the jews sentence the Ukrainian-born Demjanjuk to death in 1988, and then have the Israeli "Supreme Court" acquit him in 1993 of being the notorious "Ivan the Terrible" at the Treblinka death camp?

The answer requires you to know a little intellectual history and philosophy, but it is not difficult to understand.

The central text of the beliefs and practices of judaism is the Talmud, a 22 volume collection of jibberish/nonsense which was started in Babylon by the Pharisees perhaps as early as 2000 BC, as oral only, and then later committed to writing in 500 AD, in the wake of the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem by the Romans in 70 AD, and the jewish "diaspora" that followed.

Moshe Ben Maimon, THE "rabbi of all rabbis," commonly known as Maimonides, was sent by the Pharisees in 1135, from Hades, to provide "guidance" to the jews, in the form of a "cliff notes" to the Talmud, "The Guide For the Perplexed." The Guide, like the Talmud itself, is meant to confuse the reader, but also, to the "astute" jew student, bring recognition and “intellectual” acceptance of the miserable position of the jews.

Later, with secularization and cosmopolitanism in Europe, the Pharisees decided to offer the jews another way to accept their horrible condition: Nietzschean Zoroastrianism. With Nietzschean Zoroastrianism, the Pharisees claimed, the jews could "accept" their cursed condition with a quasi "mystical" affirmation. The formula was the threefold inverted satanic "trinity" of "amor fati," "eternal recurrence of the same," and "die Augenblick." Needless to say, no jew ever really read the difficult to understand Nietzsche, except perhaps to do a book report; and of course such "interpretations" were, like intermarriage, rebellious and selfish.

With the "children of satan" having rejected the offer of the Pharisees, the inverted "second coming" of Maimonides was planned with Adolf "Schicklgrubber" Hitler, whom the Pharisees themselves described as "the b-stard son of a thousand raving ghoulies." On April 20, 1889, "Schicklgruber," a shell of Maimonides, was born; and on January 3, 1889, Nietzsche was rendered insane. The "children of satan" were soon to be punished by their "father," the Pharisees, for having rejected the "gift" of Nietzschean Zoroastrianism which, like the Talmud itself, gives the willing jew a way of coping with coprophagia.

What was the punishment? None other than "Arbeit Macht Frei," the Pharisees restatement of the signpost to the entrance to the Inferno in Dante's "Divine Comedy": "Abandon All Hope, Ye Who Enter Here." In short, the false hope that “work” will set you free is, if you accept it, a kind of a salvation within the misery of Hades.

This is a snapshot of the way that judaism works: the jews victimize unsuspecting goy during the day, and then are "punished" in "Westworld" Hades at night for their sins. This "Westworld" Hades is, however, run by the Pharisees, who disguise themselves as old Hades Assyrian meanie-scheanies, who look like Jesse Ventura. The formula is that the jews are punished by "Hades," when actually they are being punished by the Pharisees in the Pharisee made "Westworld" addition to the old Hades, for victimizing Humanity; and then the jews are instructed to "up the ante," and do more and more victimizing of goy, until a breaking point is reached; and this "inspires" the jews to endure more and more horrors and torments in "Westworld." A good example of this is the recent Israeli violence against the People of Gaza, where the jews, "punished" for murdering and injuring so many innocent Palestinians, had to "call up the reserves," to try to reach a breaking point! What do the Pharisees get out of this? They are sadists who enjoy "punishing" their unwitting "children," but also it serves to maximize the terror and horror done to Humanity, whom the Pharisees also despise.

So, where is Demjanjuk in all this mess? Demjanjuk is most likely guilty of being a guard at Sobibor, and if he is guilty he should of course be punished. But justice in the case of the Holocaust can only be done by recognizing that the Pharisees are the authors and architects of death camp nazism; and bringing them to justice. This is very important to realize because the Pharisees murdered 50 million People in WWII so as to murder 4 million jews in the death camps, and they may try to do this again. The Pharisees know that detectives like me, not to mention Jesus Christ and all His undertakers, are hot on their trail; and are scrambling not to cover their tracks -- this is impossible -- but to -- you guessed it -- pull a "legal" fast one.

Here's how: They indict Demjanjuk for being "Ivan the Terrible" at Treblinka knowing that Demjanjuk was just a guard at Sobibor. In the legal maneuvering of this discourse Demjanjuk stands for Maimonides -- who, as the "Pharisee of all Pharisees," stands for the Pharisees -- while the lowly and ideologically unwitting yet sadistic guard Demjanjuk stands for the jews. The jews rabidly take the bait, and in convicting Demjanjuk they convict themselves of being "Schicklgruber," while the Pharisees and Maimonides have all charges against them dropped by the "Supreme Court" of Israel. And so you can see that the current trial in Germany is just the Pharisees burying the jews, their miserable and selfish "prodigal" "children," the "children of satan,” as they always do.

Will the jews ever get wise? No. The jews are zombies who are "programmed to function" to carry out their self-immolation. Will Humanity ever get wise to this fact? Yes, but this depends on People being outspoken and courageous, and also willing to do a little studying. Those who are gifted as teachers are especially important because the thinking and terms of the "discourses" of judaism, for example Nietzschean Zoroastrianism, must be put in terms that the average Person can understand. This is difficult because even the average Person may prefer the terms of the "manichean" system, as this is considered "smart" and also that it avoids retaliation.

Patrick M. Griffin
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »